When we remove a certain pest that is harmful to crops, we could also be removing a food source for a certain species.
There is no evidence that GMOs pose any dangers at all. I'll attack this as a whole, and then move on to con's individual examples. Con attributes world hunger to a bad economy consistently in his rebuttal; I'll go ahead and put this in a syllogism.
First, they lower food prices.
GM golden rice had enough beta-carotene to help prevent blindness caused by Vitamin A deficiency in the developing world. Insect Resistance Some GMO foods have been modified to make them more resistant to insects and other pests.
However, "yellow squash, papaya, and potatoes species have now been genetically engineered to resist such plant viruses. List of the Pros of Transgenic Animals 1.
The proliferation of glyphosate-resistant GMO crops has lead to massive increases in the 13 http: Economic problems within the developing world contribute to world hunger. If there is new evidence of health risks, we need to know about them, of course.
This not only helps people get the nutrients they need, but also plays a significant role in fighting against malnutrition in third-world countries.
They are added expense to the government. It is best to know the views of proponents and opponents about this controversial topic. The opposition to GMOs has made it much harder to develop new varieties.
We have genetically modified varieties of cotton, for instance, that are resistant to insects that can otherwise threaten the plant. However, it is important to proceed with caution to avoid unfavorable consequences for the surroundings and our health, considering that genetic engineering technology is very powerful.
Contention II-Adaptability GM foods also allow for farmers to rapidly adapt to a wide variety of otherwise unfavorable circumstances. Finally, GMO foods are actually significantly better for the environment because they can cut down on the use of pesticides.
As people in poorer countries spend over half of their income on food alone, this means automatic reduction of poverty. List of Cons of Transgenic Animals 1. So, think of my argument like this.
But we need to evaluate the risks and benefits scientifically. Con even concedes to this; the fact that glyphosate is a safer herbicide cannot be dismissed as a benefit because it proves: The dramatic reduction in pesticide use applies to all sects of GM farming and is a huge benefit since pesticides are significantly more toxic to humans than GM crops, which is exemplified by the sharp reduction of poisoning rates in India.
GM crops save money, not only due to crop yields, but due to money saved on pesticides.
However, I will make some notes. They should at least be given a choice through a decent labelling system. Gene Spilling It is unclear what effects, if there are any, the genetic pollution resulting from inadequate sequestering of genetically modified crop populations would have on the wild varieties surrounding them.Benefits outweigh risks from genetically modified plants 23 January Australian states should not ban commercial production of genetically modified (GM) plants and food as the risks are alarmist and exaggerated, according to a new study.
The term GM foods or GMOs (genetically-modified organisms) is most commonly used to refer to crop plants created for human or animal consumption using the latest molecu- lar biology techniques.
Con's evidence shouldn't factor in to whether or not the benefits of GM crops outweigh the harms because his evidence doesn't compare glyphosate to other currently used herbicides in. Design and Analysis of Manual Rice Planter. benefits of genetically-modified-foods outweigh the harms.
Before we begin, we debate. We would also like to put in place that to win today’s debate, the con must make the impact of their harms connect to humans, otherwise no harms can be seen to the general public, and that we must. willeyshandmadecandy.com Page 1 of Foundation Briefs November PF Brief Resolved: On balance, the benefits of genetically modified foods outweigh the harms.
Young Moola Baby Con Case Shahzaib Ali CON Case My partner and I negate the following resolution resolved: On Balance the Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods Outweigh the Harms.
Contention 1: GMO’S HURT THE ENVIRONMENT A. The use of GM crops cause honeybee colony depletion that spreads worldwide, destroying agriculture Hutaff, 07 (Matt, "Give Bees a Chance," The Simon, 1 May.Download